Re: [dnsext] [dnsdir] [EXT] Asking for review on this errata by DNSSEC experts Re: [Errata Verified] RFC4035 (5226)Re: [dnsext] [dnsdir] [EXT] Asking for review on this errata by DNSSEC experts Re: [Errata Verified] RFC4035 (5226)
Dave Lawrence
2023-08-14
dnsext
None
/arch/msg/dnsext/4j4uXNOxmrQ-v88OnJsC-nVDdwA/
3343098
2077857
Re: [dnsext] [EXT] Asking for review on this errata by DNSSEC experts Re: [Errata Verified] RFC4035 (5226)Re: [dnsext] [EXT] Asking for review on this errata by DNSSEC experts Re: [Errata Verified] RFC4035 (5226)
Peter van Dijk
2023-08-14
dnsext
None
/arch/msg/dnsext/c8x8eqYrUPV7HCIFwyL6FEcdYEg/
3342917
2077857
Re: [dnsext] Asking for review on this errata by DNSSEC experts Re: [Errata Verified] RFC4035 (5226)Re: [dnsext] Asking for review on this errata by DNSSEC experts Re: [Errata Verified] RFC4035 (5226)
Rose, Scott W. (Fed)
2023-08-07
dnsext
None
/arch/msg/dnsext/1MbysZRL3602EksYWuTufaTvvus/
3340268
2077857
Re: [dnsext] Asking for review on this errata by DNSSEC experts Re: [Errata Verified] RFC4035 (5226)Re: [dnsext] Asking for review on this errata by DNSSEC experts Re: [Errata Verified] RFC4035 (5226)
Rob Austein
2023-08-06
dnsext
None
/arch/msg/dnsext/RTvgmzS7xzXlttUChNViraJpCzI/
3340267
2077857
[dnsext] Asking for review on this errata by DNSSEC experts Re: [Errata Verified] RFC4035 (5226)[dnsext] Asking for review on this errata by DNSSEC experts Re: [Errata Verified] RFC4035 (5226)
Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
2023-08-05
dnsext
None
/arch/msg/dnsext/1bPTww2CumoUmQlnpNPtjuxiSNg/
3340266
2077857
Re: [dnsext] [Errata Verified] RFC4035 (5226)Re: [dnsext] [Errata Verified] RFC4035 (5226)
Mark Andrews
2023-08-05
dnsext
None
/arch/msg/dnsext/9Zx4d2U5woqOht52d__5CqpP4Tc/
3340265
2077555
[dnsext] [Errata Verified] RFC4035 (5226)[dnsext] [Errata Verified] RFC4035 (5226)
RFC Errata System
2023-08-03
dnsext
None
/arch/msg/dnsext/mSa1uyzam0WQoOmZU11eIPDtu-A/
3339254
2077555
[dnsext] [Errata Verified] RFC5702 (7090)[dnsext] [Errata Verified] RFC5702 (7090)
RFC Errata System
2022-08-26
dnsext
None
/arch/msg/dnsext/XguPsGvIJZLh-AorgVdE6hLuXqA/
3216363
2026483
Re: [dnsext] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5702 (7090)Re: [dnsext] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5702 (7090)
Warren Kumari
2022-08-18
dnsext
None
/arch/msg/dnsext/lHxfuJZbWM8QW_JYbilDv9Jof-A/
3213237
2024976
[dnsext] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5702 (7090)[dnsext] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5702 (7090)
RFC Errata System
2022-08-15
dnsext
None
/arch/msg/dnsext/7QwMENAotYLyyFwtV3KPP7BZkcg/
3211708
2024976
Re: [dnsext] RFC 4470 bitmap (Was Re: Authenticated denial of existence...)Re: [dnsext] RFC 4470 bitmap (Was Re: Authenticated denial of existence...)
Tony Finch
2013-11-22
dnsext
None
/arch/msg/dnsext/iRWq-X092qf5pnxz3aOSbhAWMz8/
372384
1127371
[dnsext] Protocol Action: 'Signaling Cryptographic Algorithm Understanding in DNSSEC' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-algo-signal-10.txt)[dnsext] Protocol Action: 'Signaling Cryptographic Algorithm Understanding in DNSSEC' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-algo-signal-10.txt)
The IESG
2013-05-17
dnsext
None
/arch/msg/dnsext/_jr5F69mNWoyJFk4ak_6tTlMys8/
371948
1127398
[dnsext] RFC 6840 on Clarifications and Implementation Notes for DNS Security (DNSSEC)[dnsext] RFC 6840 on Clarifications and Implementation Notes for DNS Security (DNSSEC)
rfc-editor
2013-02-21
dnsext
None
/arch/msg/dnsext/6VRmNoxCj0Sk_GqkRzbS1YCM0UU/
371648
1127420
Re: [dnsext] type NSEC query at a parent's zone cutRe: [dnsext] type NSEC query at a parent's zone cut
Mark Andrews
2012-10-05
dnsext
None
/arch/msg/dnsext/1E5hJtFTuVT1DA12NlWj0LU27oI/
371502
1127455
Re: [dnsext] type NSEC query at a parent's zone cutRe: [dnsext] type NSEC query at a parent's zone cut
JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
2012-10-05
dnsext
None
/arch/msg/dnsext/13zD40MThN0olyTPlSIvnYHHYqA/
371498
1127455
Re: [dnsext] type NSEC query at a parent's zone cutRe: [dnsext] type NSEC query at a parent's zone cut
Olafur Gudmundsson
2012-10-05
dnsext
None
/arch/msg/dnsext/WlzFOq0Oe5tgErlqoVEqkW0iC40/
371487
1127455
Re: [dnsext] SOA without NSRe: [dnsext] SOA without NS
Jim Reid
2012-10-04
dnsext
None
/arch/msg/dnsext/0zd-5oJkkEUBOc0y51toS1mmfTM/
371483
1127454
[dnsext] type NSEC query at a parent's zone cut[dnsext] type NSEC query at a parent's zone cut
JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
2012-10-04
dnsext
None
/arch/msg/dnsext/LImXqXJ3E6wVmuQqCLrWeEM9YVc/
371476
1127455
[dnsext] type NSEC query at a parent's zone cut[dnsext] type NSEC query at a parent's zone cut
JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
2012-10-04
dnsext
None
/arch/msg/dnsext/roqv4CLcG6RHktqk1_tv9MpFszQ/
371475
1127455
[dnsext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-bis-updates-20.txt[dnsext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-bis-updates-20.txt
internet-drafts
2012-09-28
dnsext
None
/arch/msg/dnsext/G0Cp-een3QJX1Ymxfqt73Bk4flE/
371440
1127463
Re: [dnsext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-algo-signal-08.txtRe: [dnsext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-algo-signal-08.txt
Dick Franks
2012-08-22
dnsext
None
/arch/msg/dnsext/p-CRlUcCX0su5XGg_U2rVLTT_is/
371407
1127468
[dnsext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-bis-updates-19.txt[dnsext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-bis-updates-19.txt
internet-drafts
2012-07-13
dnsext
None
/arch/msg/dnsext/3xkGVRH2LqNNidlL4ijGpr9ouR4/
371340
1127483
Re: [dnsext] [apps-discuss] APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-bis-updates-18Re: [dnsext] [apps-discuss] APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-bis-updates-18
S Moonesamy
2012-06-21
dnsext
None
/arch/msg/dnsext/q7N4RIYtUnA1lD9nT3EvQv0dtkU/
371290
1127503
Re: [dnsext] [apps-discuss] APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-bis-updates-18Re: [dnsext] [apps-discuss] APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-bis-updates-18
Andrew Sullivan
2012-06-19
dnsext
None
/arch/msg/dnsext/W0ZQ3k9OHGjxqf1_rryUqXSzDMU/
371273
1127503
Re: [dnsext] rfc4035 & 5155 : order of RR's ?Re: [dnsext] rfc4035 & 5155 : order of RR's ?
Francis Dupont
2012-05-30
dnsext
None
/arch/msg/dnsext/S-5azG7EzI3L12DHUVZWyrTNBgk/
371242
1127501
[dnsext] rfc4035 & 5155 : order of RR's ?[dnsext] rfc4035 & 5155 : order of RR's ?
Marc Lampo
2012-05-30
dnsext
None
/arch/msg/dnsext/lLNhPSKcZksl2tkYtRdnj4h_N1Y/
371241
1127501
[dnsext] APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-bis-updates-18[dnsext] APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-bis-updates-18
S Moonesamy
2012-05-22
dnsext
None
/arch/msg/dnsext/aFqIiSyVbrU1jVI6Fl6IOv62JkE/
371238
1127503
Re: [dnsext] [reed@reedmedia.net: comments on draft-weiler-dnsext-dnssec-bis-updates 18]Re: [dnsext] [reed@reedmedia.net: comments on draft-weiler-dnsext-dnssec-bis-updates 18]
Samuel Weiler
2012-05-18
dnsext
None
/arch/msg/dnsext/UCoRcuM7ccK5sLvlWeuj1tyAjhA/
371236
1127506
[dnsext] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-bis-updates-18.txt> (Clarifications and Implementation Notes for DNSSECbis) to Proposed Standard[dnsext] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-bis-updates-18.txt> (Clarifications and Implementation Notes for DNSSECbis) to Proposed Standard
The IESG
2012-05-17
dnsext
None
/arch/msg/dnsext/89al-m1WjrNHw-YyyMbZ1kWwBM8/
371235
1127504
[dnsext] [reed@reedmedia.net: comments on draft-weiler-dnsext-dnssec-bis-updates 18][dnsext] [reed@reedmedia.net: comments on draft-weiler-dnsext-dnssec-bis-updates 18]
Andrew Sullivan
2012-05-07
dnsext
None
/arch/msg/dnsext/W_ZKvH5GLSxu0amREdkFyGNRS4c/
371230
1127506
[dnsext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-bis-updates-18.txt[dnsext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-bis-updates-18.txt
internet-drafts
2012-04-30
dnsext
None
/arch/msg/dnsext/yy8uY_GKtfw886MHpufM469WWgs/
371217
1127511
[dnsext] editorials in draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-registry-update-01[dnsext] editorials in draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-registry-update-01
Alfred Hönes
2012-03-27
dnsext
None
/arch/msg/dnsext/FMSPZrHGxLsIa6HvnBW5rnPPq10/
371116
1127541
Re: [dnsext] WGLC on draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-algo-signal-05.txtRe: [dnsext] WGLC on draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-algo-signal-05.txt
Miek Gieben
2012-03-26
dnsext
None
/arch/msg/dnsext/69nM8e6HAEoC8NmoH_2cMUd_NI0/
371098
1127551
Re: [dnsext] Validator assumptions: what algorithms need to properly sign a zone?Re: [dnsext] Validator assumptions: what algorithms need to properly sign a zone?
Tony Finch
2012-03-26
dnsext
None
/arch/msg/dnsext/iNLUv3IQAtuqNtRw6UAZqfLE9E4/
371096
1127554
Re: [dnsext] Validator assumptions: what algorithms need to properly sign a zone?Re: [dnsext] Validator assumptions: what algorithms need to properly sign a zone?
Mark Andrews
2012-03-26
dnsext
None
/arch/msg/dnsext/13P_LL4pymMe6BOGzHl2ysYlT1Y/
371092
1127554
Re: [dnsext] Validator assumptions: what algorithms need to properly sign a zone?Re: [dnsext] Validator assumptions: what algorithms need to properly sign a zone?
Mark Andrews
2012-03-26
dnsext
None
/arch/msg/dnsext/2SrhQ1ZtA10gldgFndMmTD_dwZ8/
371091
1127554
Re: [dnsext] Validator assumptions: what algorithms need to properly sign a zone?Re: [dnsext] Validator assumptions: what algorithms need to properly sign a zone?
Mark Andrews
2012-03-26
dnsext
None
/arch/msg/dnsext/kfrIrIOR5aeNlMknSraXU_Jtta4/
371090
1127554
Re: [dnsext] Validator assumptions: what algorithms need to properly sign a zone?Re: [dnsext] Validator assumptions: what algorithms need to properly sign a zone?
Olafur Gudmundsson
2012-03-23
dnsext
None
/arch/msg/dnsext/O8xMnTyhs4o5crB8qba6JDoMSFQ/
371089
1127554
Re: [dnsext] Validator assumptions: what algorithms need to properly sign a zone?Re: [dnsext] Validator assumptions: what algorithms need to properly sign a zone?
Tony Finch
2012-03-23
dnsext
None
/arch/msg/dnsext/3KTPru2UF0dik9eQLf2UJrB2suE/
371086
1127554
[dnsext] Validator assumptions: what algorithms need to properly sign a zone?[dnsext] Validator assumptions: what algorithms need to properly sign a zone?
Olafur Gudmundsson
2012-03-23
dnsext
None
/arch/msg/dnsext/EYBdQEDLNaOvKCVxHkSm1DZ7suM/
371083
1127554